Press "Enter" to skip to content

Our Mazda CX-5 Turbo Deserves a Better Infotainment System

putriwh 0

Mazda’s dated UI is an imperfection on an in any case amazing minimized SUV. 20,000-Mile Update

It has taken almost a year for our long haul Mazda CX-5 to cross the midpoint in its 40,000-mile remain with us. However, that continuous mile gathering isn’t for the Mazda’s absence of goodness as a minimized SUV. While we’re not negligible enough to avoid the CX-5’s attractive styling, great driving character, and inconvenience free dependability in light of its infuriating infotainment framework, that maturing interface is about the main thing we have had the option to reliably scrutinize.

For sure, our Mazda is pleasing to the point that the vast majority of the not many sections in its logbook community on the little 7.0-inch infotainment show and the two its moderate reaction and not exactly consistent activity. “It’s disturbing to need to explore into menu structures just to peruse radio broadcasts,” composed print chief Eric Tingwall. “A devoted look for or tuning control is frantically required. I ordinarily like these control-handle based frameworks, however in the event that it will be this cumbersome, I’d preferably simply utilize the touchscreen.” While Mazda has amplified that touchscreen to 8.0 crawls in higher trim levels as a major aspect of its updates to the CX-5 for the 2020 model year, this working framework despite everything feels awkward and dated contrasted with the brand’s more up to date arrangement found in its Mazda 3 and CX-30 models.


Michael SimariCar and Driver

Notice – Continue Reading Below

In any case, after in excess of 20,000 miles and no deficiency of fresher contenders to test, the CX-5 keeps on dazzling with its discretionary 250-hp turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-four. While that motor increases an extra 10 lb-ft of torque to 320 lb-ft for 2020, we don’t miss it on our 2019 model. It probably won’t be the snappiest in the smaller hybrid section—that would be the new Ford Escape with its discretionary turbo 2.0-liter four—yet the CX-5 turbo’s smooth, responsive force conveyance confer to it a tad bit of the MX-5 Miata’s spunky character. We’re likewise satisfied with the Mazda’s normal mileage of 24 mpg, spot on with its EPA joined gauge.

More on the Mazda CX-5

2019 Mazda CX-5 Signature 2.5T AWD

2019 Mazda CX-5 2.5T Signature – A Luxurious Turbo


Toyota RAV4 versus Mazda CX-5: Which Is Better?

Extra fulfillment originates from the CX-5’s six-speed programmed transmission, which mixes outfits cleverly and successfully enough, particularly in Sport mode, that we never feel shorted by the absence of oar shifters on its directing wheel. Contrasted with the frequently soft and rambling persistently factor programmed transmissions found in a large number of the CX-5’s friends, this six-speed ‘box is refreshingly all around tuned for both apathetic and lively driving. Staff members keep on exacting comparable commendation on the exact and direct guiding, the arranged body control that opposes unsettling influences from Michigan’s disgraceful streets, and the agreeably upscale inside of our top-spec Signature model.

The CX-5 additionally has been completely dependable. Not at all like a large number of our other current long-termers, not by any means a punctured tire or a broke windshield has intruded on the Mazda’s spotless streak. Our solitary visit to the seller since our last test was for planned upkeep at around 21,000 miles, which added up to $162 for an oil and channel change, lodge air channel substitution, and tire pivot.


Michael SimariCar and Driver

Notice – Continue Reading Below

Utilized as an utility vehicle, the CX-5 is as competent as it is charming to drive. Street warrior Scott Olman had the option to fit a lounge area table and six seats in the rear of the Mazda with both of its back seats collapsed, which is truly good in any minimal ute. The colder temperatures of winter in Michigan likewise have helped us value the adequacy of the CX-5 Signature’s standard warmed front seats and controlling wheel, albeit a deficiency of snow hitherto has implied we’ve had little chance to try out the brilliant foul-climate footing of the Nokian Hakkapeliitta winter tires we’ve introduced. There is still a lot of time for a greater amount of the white stuff to fall, however, and for us to put a lot more miles on the CX-5.

Months in Fleet: 11 months Current Mileage: 22,636 miles

Normal Fuel Economy: 24 mpg

Fuel Tank Size: 15.3 lady Observed Fuel Range: 360 miles

Administration: $427 Normal Wear: $0 Repair: $0

Harm and Destruction: $0


2019 Mazda CX-5 Signature 2.5 Turbo AWD


front-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-traveler, 4-entryway hatchback


$39,900 (base cost: $37,935)

Motor TYPE

turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum square and head, direct fuel infusion


152 in3, 2488 cm3


250 hp @ 5000 rpm


310 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm


6-speed programmed with manual moving mode


Suspension (F/R): swaggers/multilink

Brakes (F/R): 12.6-in vented plate/11.9-in circle

Tires: Toyo A36, P225/55R-19 99V M+S


Wheelbase: 106.2 in

Length: 179.1 in

Width: 72.5 in

Tallness: 65.3 in

Traveler volume: 102 ft3

Freight volume: 31 ft3

Control weight: 3812 lb


Rollout, 1 ft: 0.3 sec

60 mph: 6.1 sec

100 mph: 16.2 sec

130 mph: 39.7 sec

Moving beginning, 5–60 mph: 6.7 sec

Top apparatus, 30–50 mph: 3.2 sec

Top apparatus, 50–70 mph: 4.4 sec

¼-mile: 14.6 sec @ 95 mph

Top speed (senator constrained): 130 mph

Braking, 70–0 mph: 175 ft

Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.78 g



Watched: 24 mpg

Unscheduled oil augmentations: 0 qt


Consolidated/city/expressway: 24/22/27 mpg


3 years/36,000 miles packed in;

5 years/60,000 miles powertrain;

5 years/Unlimited miles erosion security;

3 years/36,000 miles emergency aides

10,000-Mile Update


2019 Mazda CX-5 Signature

Brad FickCar and Driver

Notice – Continue Reading Below

Up until now, the way to 40,000 miles in our Mazda CX-5 has been smooth, even as winter slides on these Michigan streets. There’s nothing stunning about minimized hybrids, other than the rate at which buyers continue getting them. Up until this point, the CX-5 has proceeded true to form, with a couple of minor irritations sprinkled on top.

As a major aspect of our present 17-vehicle long haul test armada, the Mazda CX-5 covers its attractive face behind our all the more intriguing, and now and again tricky, vehicles. It’s anything but difficult to be dominated by, state, our 362-hp twin-turbo Mercedes wagon, or a long-termer that will go anonymous yet is fastened to the eventual fate of driverless vehicles and furthermore has a fart button. (Indeed, it’s our Tesla Model 3.) The CX-5 resembles an agreeable knee support: you would prefer not to wear it, however when you do it’s not all that awful, in light of the fact that it’s acceptable at what it should do.

VIEW PHOTOS 2019 Mazda CX-5 Signature

Brad FickCar and Driver

Our long-termer has the new-for-2019 250-hp turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-four. This motor is just accessible with all-wheel-drive models. Soon after we requested our own, Mazda included a 2.0-liter diesel motor choice. The cost of our all-wheel-drive Signature trim CX-5 is $39,850, which got us a Bose sound framework, versatile headlights, a warmed controlling wheel, warmed front and back seats (ventilated in front), and a 360-degree stopping camera. The alternatives on our own put it a long way from the $25,395 CX-5’s base cost and closer in cost to the Jeep Cherokee or the GMC Terrain Denali.

Commercial – Continue Reading Below

Our involvement in the turbocharged motor has produced scarcely any remarks, which is something to be thankful for. On the off chance that architects can make something to shield car columnists from griping, they should box it and offer it to the majority. Mazda seems to have done quite recently that. The new turbo motor discharges an observable groan. The commotion is to some degree expected for a motor that can send the CX-5 from zero to 60 mph in just 6.1 seconds. We’ve discovered the CX-5’s 187-hp base motor feels underpowered—or, at the end of the day, exhausting. Which is a descriptive word we would use to portray most patients in the emergency clinic wing of minimal hybrids. Our CX-5 wishes them a full recuperation.

VIEW PHOTOS 2019 Mazda CX-5 Signature

Brad FickCar and Driver

That isn’t to say our sentiment with the CX-5 has been great. A mind-boggling number of passages in the CX-5’s logbook cry over moderate infotainment stacking times. After startup, a few staff members were threatened with the failure to change the SiriusXM channel from E Street to Fly FM sufficiently quick. The 7.0-inch touchscreen loads at a similar rate that old hips move to Springsteen. Now and again, SiriusXM experienced redundant lost-signal mistakes, an issue irritating enough that one of us said it would keep them from purchasing a CX-5.

Promotion – Continue Reading Below

Another basic wound in the logbook was the low-res camera. The 7.0-inch touchscreen is now scarcely bigger than telephones labeled XL, however the camera quality was considered poor by three staff members who had driven the vehicle long separations. The longest outing was a 800-mile end of the week venture by testing chief Dave VanderWerp, who was disinterested by the CX-5’s driver-help innovation. The nonattendance of path focusing implies that when the CX-5 starts to meander from its path, it doesn’t consequently right and prod the vehicle back to security. The CX-5 just hums, which isn’t a lot of help contrasted with a portion of its less expensive opponents with comparable help tech.


2019 Mazda CX-5 Signature

Brad FickCar and Driver

A crisp arrangement of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 winter tires proved to be useful not long ago, when the principal significant snowfall hit the Midwest. Senior editorial manager Joey Capparella stated: “These Nokian winter tires feel entirely relentless. The warmed seats and guiding wheel get pleasant and toasty.” Meaning staff members anticipating telecommuting on snow days ought not take the CX-5 the prior night.

The CX-5 has been returned to the vendor twice, yet just for routine maintenan